Leadership debt explains the cost of developing leaders more slowly than the business grows. But recognising the debt is only the first step. Understanding personality can help organisations identify why it develops and how to address it.
Being brilliant at the job isn’t the same as being ready to lead the people doing the job. Suddenly, your high performer is expected to delegate, give feedback, manage former peers, navigate difficult conversations, make decisions through uncertainty and somehow get results through other people. All while figuring out what kind of leader they actually want to be.
By now, one thing should be clear - psychological safety is not created by a workshop, a policy or a set of values on a wall. It is created through lived experience. And while everyone contributes to that experience, leadership and systems play a disproportionate role in whether psychological safety is sustained or slowly eroded. Most organisations don’t lack intent. They lack alignment.
Psychological safety is rarely built through grand gestures. It’s built through small, repeatable behaviours that signal how people can expect to be treated. Most teams don’t struggle because they don’t care about safety. They struggle because safety is assumed rather than practiced.
Psychological safety is easiest to see when things are calm. Work is predictable. People know what is expected of them. Time feels sufficient. Decisions are clear and responsibilities articulated. In these conditions, most teams appear collaborative, open and respectful. But psychological safety isn’t really revealed in calm moments.
Psychological safety has become one of the most talked-about ideas in modern organisations. It appears in leadership frameworks, culture statements and learning agendas. It’s referenced in conversations about engagement, wellbeing and performance. And yet, in many teams, people still hesitate before speaking up.
Leadership has changed more in the last few years than in the previous three decades. The role is heavier. The expectations are broader. The emotional load is higher. And the skills required are more human than ever. The world leaders operate in today is more complex and more human than anything before it.
Leadership these days doesn’t just mean setting direction, managing resources, or making decisions. Increasingly it means inspiring, developing, and coaching others. But to lead as a coach, to bring out the best in people, one needs more than technique. You need awareness - of yourself, your style, and of others’.
Many organisations talk about wanting a “coaching culture.” You’ll hear it in strategy documents, leadership speeches, HR’s ‘big plan’ decks. But often, it ends up being workshops, performance reviews, or one off mentor pairings. The flame flickers, then dims. What makes the difference between a culture that sticks and one that drifts?
When Sophie first came to coaching, she was frustrated. She had clear goals: step into leadership, get her team working well together, deliver results. But after three months, she felt stuck. Her coach was encouraging her to “be more structured, plan tighter, keep control.” Sophie tried, but each attempt left her drained and less motivated.
Facet5 Global
3 Mill Yard Offices,
Childerley Estate,
Dry Drayton, Cambridge
CB23 8BA, UK
T. +44 (0)1954 602460
E. hello@facet5global.com
FOLLOW US
LET’S STAY IN TOUCH
Stay in the loop with fresh insights on personality and people – delivered straight to your inbox.